[Scpg] -SBOrgGdn- Re: [sbperm] No pruning may offer best roses, fruit crops?

[lbsaltzman at aol.com]

We have been minimalist pruners of our fruit trees and can see no problems from underpruning. We basically prune dead wood and crossed branches, lightly top a few trees that we prune for size and do nothing else. We also am a minimalists on thinning the trees of too much fruit.  As long as their isn't so much fruit that a branch will break we let the tree self thin itself.  Combine that with dry farming the mature trees, and we get smaller but far tastier fruit than overwatered, oversize fruit from the market.

Larry


-----Original Message-----
From: loren luyendyk <lorenluyendyk at hotmail.com>
To: Owen Dell <odell at silcom.com>; SB Permaculture <sbperm2006 at googlegroups.com>
Cc: Organic GardenCLub <sbogc at yahoogroups.com>; fossil-free-landscaping at googlegroups.com; scpg at arashi.com; crfgvsb at gmail.com; beardtropics at earthlink.net
Sent: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 2:44 pm
Subject: RE: -SBOrgGdn- Re: [sbperm] No pruning may offer best roses, fruit crops?






I too suspected as much.  I have noticed that (most) pruned fruit trees produce far less fruit than their unpruned counterparts.  They are also exposed to disease at the cut.  The only advantages I see to pruning are for increased fruit size (less fruit means bigger individual fruits, but overall less weight per tree) and the obvious like crossing limbs or to keep the tree small.

My mom never prunes her roses and they are the healthiest plants I have seen.  She gets flowers all year in Ojai (still blooming).  

In my opinion, the most common mistake in
 pruning (besides pruning too much) is timing.  The time of year is very important in how the plant will respond to the pruning.  We have all seen a tree send out a million shoots at the spot it was pruned.  I think this is because it was pruned at the wrong time.

Loren Luyendyk
(805) 452-8249
www.sborganics.com
www.surferswithoutborders.org





CC: sbogc at yahoogroups.com; Fossil-Free-Landscaping at googlegroups.com; Scpg at arashi.com; crfgvsb at gmail.com; Beardtropics at earthlink.net
To: sbperm2006 at googlegroups.com
From: odell at silcom.com
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:44:55 -0800
Subject: -SBOrgGdn- Re: [sbperm] No pruning may offer best roses, fruit crops?




Excellent news! I suspected as much. There's another study that 
proved that unpruned trees (natives and ornamentals, not fruit trees) 
do better in winds because the leaves and branchlets absorb the 
energy of the wind. Traditionally pruned ornamental trees, thinned to 
"take the sail out," had problems with loss of major limbs and 
overturning, whereas the same kinds of trees growing in a natural 
unpruned state did not.

What makes us think we can outsmart millions of years of slow, steady 
evolution towards the optimal forms of organisms? Seems to me that 
it's a product of the human need to control everything, not backed up 
by good science. Much of conventional horticulture is of a similar 
origin, and is similarly unsupported by any scientific evidence. I 
applaud any effort to learn what really is going on, and to better 
understand our role in t
he care of our plants and garden ecosystems. 
I suspect that we have much to learn.

Pruning to control size is a similarly dubious idea, made necessary 
by placement of a plant in a space not adequate for its ultimate 
size. Under normal circumstances, the only pruning that really makes 
sense (off the top of my head) is 1.) removing crossing, damaged, 
weak or otherwise truly troublesome branches, 2.) minor corrections 
to young trees in order to develop a good branching structure, and 
3.) safety pruning to remove branches that might become a hazard. 
Pruning should be done from the inside, not from outside. There are 
exceptions to this information, of course, such as espaliered trees, 
sheared hedges (only where there is no other solution to the problem 
of screening), and perhaps controlling the size of fruit trees where 
we intentionally have placed them in too small a space on the 
principle that it's better to do so and enjoy the fruit that to have 
nothing simply because our land isn't big enough to accommodate fully- 
developed trees.

I love to prune and it's hard not to dive in and clean up a badly 
structured plant. I'm as much of a control freak as any gardener (we 
really do love to play God, don't we?), and I work to control my own 
instincts in this regard. I note that there is a call for volunteers 
to prune the roses at the Mission; I wonder what would happen if this 
information were made available to them? It's really hard to tell 
peo
ple that everything they know is wrong, but sometimes it's the 
best thing in the long run.

Owen

On Dec 24, 2008, at 9:46 AM, LBUZZELL at aol.com wrote:

> Before you do any winter pruning, please read this article!
>
> Gregg Lowery of Vintage Gardens in Sebastopol, CA has written a 
> very important article about the scientific evidence that now 
> contradicts traditional procedures for rose pruning. This article 
> may also have relevance for how we prune fruit trees, since roses 
> are members of the rosaceae family which includes many fruit trees.
>
> In short, the British rose society did experimental trials on three 
> methods: traditional pruning, trimming with hedge trimmers and no 
> pruning at all. The winner in terms of health and bloom was -- you 
> guessed it -- no pruning at all. The British rosarians were in an 
> uproar!!! How could it be possible that the plants know better 
> than people how to do their job?
> \
> We may still choose to prune for size, of course -- but we need to 
> know that we're not helping the health of the plant by doing so, 
> and a gentle hand is needed.
>
> http://www.vintagegardens.com/PDF/Vintage%20Newsletter%2012_19_08.pdf
>
> Happy holidays,
> Linda
>
>
>
> One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, 
> and Yahoo Mail. Try it now.
>
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "sbperm2006" group.
> To post to thi
s group, send email to sbperm2006 at googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sbperm2006 
> +unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/ 
> group/sbperm2006?hl=en
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>




It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster. Get your account now. 




__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 

Messages | Polls | Members 


MARKETPLACE


>From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods 



 
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional 
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 






Recent Activity


Visit Your Group 



Drive Traffic

Sponsored Search

can help increase

your site traffic.



Yahoo! Groups

Going Green Zone

Save the planet.

Your resources to go green.



Everyday Wellness

on Yahoo! Groups

Find groups that will

help you stay fit.




.

 
__,_._,___ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.permaculture-guilds.org/pipermail/southern-california-permaculture/attachments/20081227/ea529cf8/attachment.html>