[Scpg] (Fwd) Interview with Bill Mollison Part Two from Seeda of Change Email Newletter

[scpg-admin at arashi.com]

'
Subject:        	Interview with Bill Mollison Part Two
Date sent:      	Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:38:56 -0700

Seeds of Change eNewsletter #26, April 8, 2002 100% Organic
Seeds and Food

PLEASE view this eNewsletter with PHOTOS at:
http://click.mars-inc.com/UM/T.asp?A17.61.8.1.548

INTERVIEW WITH BILL MOLLISON

PART TWO

Scott Vlaun:  Do you think that by building small-scale permaculture
systems in your own backyard, like your one room in Sweden for
instance, that it makes you more aware of how larger systems work
so we can better understand the consequences of our actions?

Bill Mollison:  Yes, for example, I went to a new ecology, the tropics,
latitude 28 and I went to the grasslands. Now tropical grasslands are
fearful things: they're over your head, they're tangled, they're awful,
and we turned it back into jungle, into rain forest; in about three
years.  I put in some 45 dams and miles and miles of swales, so it all
turned into a huge self-watering system. So, at the end of three or
four years, I said: I can do it, I can create paradise out of hell. There
were 57 big Herefords on this farm of 170 acres—and you couldn't
fatten them so you couldn't make it pay. And that's all there
was—just great big earth-tamping machines running around losing
money and now, you know, we produce more fish out of a half acre
pond than all the Herefords put together. And thousands of mangoes
and endless bunches of bananas and on and on and on and on.

SV:   Is this a model that could be used to regenerate the rain forest
that's being destroyed?

BM:  Well, up to a point. You can reclaim the tropical grasslands, but if
you take southeast Brazil, or the southeast part of the Amazon, it
turned into white sand desert once they cleared the rain forest. It's a
long way back from white sand desert; it's not as happy a situation
as back from grass.

And on the other side, in Ecuador, around a little town whose name is
Cangagua, when they took the rain forest off there was only a thin
layer of soil, about a foot, and it washed away.  Underneath that was
silica, so all the hills and valleys and everything's made out of glass.
So you own a glass landscape; how do you reclaim that? Standing on
a glass hill looking at a glass valley with a glass hill across the valley.
Well, one day, some of the troops in permaculture down there on the
coast noticed a guy up on one of those hills with a sledge hammer
and he was breaking the glass—which is thick—smashing it up and
making a sort of channel around the hill and then he was planting little
trees in the channel and they said, "Oh we can't let him do that on his
own," so they all went up there and helped him break channels
around the hills. And now they say there's a little jungle coming along
but it's going to take much longer than five to six years, but he
decided that he wasn't going to be dispirited by the glass. Cangagua,
it's called, after the town where it is. So, there are some very
discouraging places.

The other ones are in the deserts. We do analyses and we find that
96 or 98% silica and no other elements and it's non-wetting so you
can pour water on it and it all runs around on top in little bowls and
it's a bit dispiriting. I started there in an aboriginal settlement and the
only water we had was 1100 parts PPM salt; you couldn't drink it; it
would knock your kidneys out. You can feed it to cattle and you can
irrigate with it if you want to use a lot of it; it goes down through and
comes out in low places. I think in about two years we had a
booming organic garden there, in this eroded sand dune, using this
dreadful water. And the aboriginal community fed itself very well from
there and also sold a lot and made a lot of money. I think the mice
got in once and ate $8000 worth of pumpkin seeds out of it, we had
to even put out mouse fences. Mouse called moonpi. We had
moonpithons to reduce the mice and in the end we only had to put
flat sheet on fences all around our garden. So you never know what's
going to attack. First of all, we had to put a kangaroo fence, very
high, 12-15 feet high and then we had to put a moonpi fence ‘round
the outside of that to keep the mice out. Moonpis are more damage
than the kangaroos, really.

SV:  There’s always something.

BM: Yeah, there’ll always be something. And you can always stop it. I
saw an electric fence for snails. It was 4” wide plastic pipe pressed a
little bit into the earth so there’s no hope they could go under it, and
it had little studs along the top about a half or a quarter of an inch
high. It had a little thin wire running around it all and a small battery
running this little electric fence. The snails would come up over this
little pipe to cross it, leading with their eyes, and their eyes would
touch this wire and they would disappear into this dimple, into the
snail, as he got shocked through his eye stalks and he’d back off and
he would never do that again.

SV:  Really. They’re that smart.

BM: Not so smart. If somebody jolts your eyes with electricity, you
don’t want to go back there again. It’s not so much smart as really
basic.

Yeah. I think a New Zealander told me once that a New Zealander will
keep anything in or out with electric fencing. Give him elephants, give
him mice, give him snails, give him beetles, he’ll control them...

SV:  I would say that a Mainer is probably second to a New
Zealander... Everybody has an electric fence. Keep ‘em in or keep ‘em
out.

BM:  Those are for the deer.

SV:  Yes and, of course, livestock. What some people do up there,
because a deer will jump the wire, they put peanut butter on tin foil
and hang it off the wire. The deer will come and lick the peanut
butter, get shocked, and then they run away and never come back.
They won’t touch the wire. Kind of like the snails.

BM:  There are things that hate electricity. Cats are one. Possums are
another. In Australia if you put the electric fence on, every so often
there’s a loud scream as a cat tries to cross it. Then, you can turn it
off for up to six months. And then somebody gets the courage to
come back and you gotta turn it on again for awhile. Most animals
won’t cross it once they get a bad sting.

SV:  If someone was interested in permaculture and wanted to think
more about designing their landscape, even if they had a small
garden, small yard, what would be their best approach.

BM:  We publish books. We’ve got a book called Introduction to
Permaculture which is inexpensive and we’ve got another book called
the Permaculture Designers Manual. I say that book is for fanatics but
it’s probably wrong to call them fanatics. It’s for people who are
seriously interested in design.

One of my students married permaculture to his computer and he
has programs that let him pull down properties from archives kept by
the state.  He can plan all the water for the farm and tell you how
much it will be to make your dams and how many thousands of
gallons or mega-liters you’ve got in each one; how much your fence
will be; he’ll plant all your trees for you; he’ll plant them on mounds;
he’ll put mouseproof and rabbitproof collars around them all. He
invests, on behalf of people buying farms, probably a hundred million
dollars a year at present. So he does hundreds of farms; he’s always
got 20 or 30 going. He’s got a full-time surveyor;  And then he’s got
a big nursery backing that up and very large teams of planters. So he
does a lot. He’s the future of permaculture. The near future. The
present of permaculture. So, in his short life, in Victoria, after I trained
him (he doesn’t have a degree or anything), he has put in more
forests and more farms than anybody in the history of Australia and
he has decided the future of hundreds of thousands of acres of land.
And that’s how I’d have all my students go. But in America, they
seem to be going more woo woo every day, more into the
theories...

SV:  So how do we bring that practical approach back?

BM: We’ll keep training people and I’ll bring Darren over here and he’ll
workshop with people interested in computer design and the fuel will
catch fire and the woo woo’s will get blotted out.   It’s been very
rough in America. It took ages to get my students through to teach
their own courses. Very few of them went overseas into helping
areas of famine and now they’ve gone woo woo. I don’t know what
to make of it all. There just isn’t a lot of selflessness going on in
America.

SV:  If someone was interested in studying permaculture in America,
where would you send them? What do you think are the best
centers?

BM:  Damned if I know.   The Bullock brothers up on Orcas Island
have always been great, you know, mixed system, marsh and hillside
and there are many others, I’m sure. But for every Bullock brother,
there are a hundred woo woos spinning around in circles.

SV:  But don’t you think that it’s the people who aren’t necessarily
woo woo’s but are just holding on to the industrial-scale, high-input,
petroleum-based model of agribusiness and non-sustainable
development that are the real problem.

BM:  The woo woos aren’t a problem to anybody much but
themselves. It’s the people who are trying to sell you something,
particularly limited resources, that are a big problem, and you’ve got
more of them than anybody else.

The curious thing about that is this (I’m told this by your own
merchant bankers): something like 80-90% of the capital invested in
non-sustainable companies is invested by American women. So that’s
true of the whole world.

SV:  In non-sustainable companies?

BM:  Yeah. Like tobacco. So you’ve got to reform the women of
America. And the woman you’ve got to reform is young. She’s 30 to
35 years old. She’s professional. She has a degree. And she only has
a modest investment: only $18-20,000. She is running the world
right now. She’s the one who’s buggering everybody up. It is quite a
narrow section of your population and you can narrow it even more.
I’m sure you can change the whole world by working on relatively
small numbers of American women. There’s your problem. Not the
woo woos.

SV:  Interesting. What about beauty Bill? Where does beauty come
into this whole equation?

BM: You can’t take beauty out of nature no matter how you try.
Sometimes I sit in gardens, five years after I’ve made them, and
think, I didn’t do this; it did itself. They are so beautiful, they take my
breath away. I sit in there and I could sit in one place all day. In some
of the gardens that I’ve made, every bird that is represented in that
region is represented in that garden, so I started off with one nesting
species and three other species on a cattle farm in the sub-tropics
and now I’ve got 118 species, most of whom are nesting. What do
you think of that?

SV:  That’s amazing. So you’re rebuilding an entire ecology.

BM:  A beautiful ecology. The parrots in my wife’s garden—she
planted a lot of sorghum for them, and they’re all scarlet-breasted
and gaudy parrots, and emerald and blue—and she said, it’s like a
garden full of flowers really, and so she plants just to have them in
the garden.

SV: So when you design a garden, beauty is not the issue, it’s
function.

BM: Function.

SV: So really permaculture is...

BM: ... is functional design.

SV: It’s the classic “form follows function” and the beauty becomes
evident because of the functionality.

BM: I think the best thing I’ve heard about that, about form following
function, is about modern architecture. It’s “Fiasco follows form.”
Frank Lloyd Wrong and all those people. They can’t build a house you
can actually live in. I was in one of Frank Lloyd Wrong’s buildings and
to actually survive one hot summer’s night, we had to wet our
sheets, go down to the bathroom—we all slept on the floor of the
bathroom to survive—and I said, “Oh my God, and he designed this!”
It was never designed for you to live in. To look at, perhaps, but not
to live in. So, yeah. Isn’t that an awful thing to say about one of your
icons, Frank Lloyd Wrong. (laughs) I’m happy to say it about people
who pretend otherwise. If they can’t design good systems, I’m happy
to say it. We do good systems and they work very well and they’re
full of life. And when they’re full of life, to me, they’re full of beauty
because things are happening there that you could never design. That
garden gets much smarter than you are, really quickly. It’s amazing
how fast it gets clever.

SV:  Could you, in a nutshell, state some basic permaculture
principles? You’ve said that each thing should perform multiple
functions and each function should be achieved in multiple ways. Are
there other basic principles?

BM:  Yes. Make the least changes that you need to achieve what you
want. Don’t cut a tree down unless you have to... and I’ve never had
to since I’ve adopted that as a principle.

SV:  You’ve never had to cut a tree down?

BM:  Never. I’ve never had to.

SV:  But you said the first place you went to, you said you went to
the forest and cleared an acre and a half.

BM:  Oh, now, this was before permaculture. I was hatching
permaculture in that hole in the forest. In fact, I am a logger. I’ve
logged forests as a profession and broken down the logs with
Canadian twins and sawed them up into six houses every day, six
days a week. So I’ve cut up a lot of timber for housing.

SV:  What would someone in a situation like I’m in do? I live in a
forest, more or less.

BM:  There are things I call type- one errors. The first one is I say is,
for Christ’s sake, don’t move into a forest if you want to feed
yourself because you’re going to have to destroy the forest to feed
yourself. That’s a type- one error. Once you make that error, error
after error will follow. And the other thing is, don’t put your house up
on a high bluff or on a ridge. We find it impossible to save you from
fire. We find it very difficult to get roads to you and it will cost you
much more for your roads than your house. We can’t get water up
to you. We can’t keep getting it up to you in emergencies. Don’t go
there. Don’t make the error of selecting that site.

SV:  In my case, this place used to be a farm 200 years ago. It was
abandoned. Trees grew up in the fields. Somebody came and cut all
the big trees and cleared a couple of acres for a landing. They left this
huge mess, holes where the stumps were, piles of slash, piles of
stumps. We’re committed to restoring the forest ecology as well as
producing our own food.

BM:  I know what you’re talking about. You want to farm there so
you’ll have to clear some of it and so you’re caught in a bit of a bind.
And you want to farm there so you’ll have to control the animals.
You’re gonna have raccoons and possum and God knows what after
your corn ears, aren’t you? So you’re gonna eat raccoon or shoot
raccoon or set out wire fences against raccoon or something. So
you’ve forced yourself into a situation where you’re not sure that’s
where you want to be, you know, shooting deer and cutting down
trees.

The whole of the peninsula of northeast Australia runs right up into
the tropics, it’s called Cape York. When we first got photographs of it,
it was solid rain forest. In Sydney, though, we’re noticing little holes
appearing in the rain forest all along the coast and, in the end, they
turned into quite large holes with buildings in them. So, they went to
have a look, and the hippies were escaping the city by going to Cape
York, finding a nice waterfall ten yards from a beach, cutting
themselves a clearing, putting in a garden and building a house and
then getting a bigger house and asking their friends to come. So the
hippies were actually eating the rain forest. And they’re the very
people who turn up in thousands to stop all forests being cut
anywhere. But they themselves, at home, were the main cause of
the disappearance of a very uncommon tropical rain forest because
they like to live in a beautiful place. What they don’t like to do is build
a beautiful place to go and live in. They like to go to a place that is
already very beautiful. That’s very typical of rich people and hippies.
You’ll hear hundreds of hippies say, “Oh, I’ve found this marvelous
place. It’s got a waterfall; it’s got beautiful trees. It’s got thousands
of birds, you know. I’m gonna build there.” It’s right in a national
park! You’ll hear that a million times, right? And I think, “You stupid
bastard. You’re a type- one error yourself!”(laughs)  The hippy should
go somewhere where there’s no forest, like I did, where there’s just
cattle-trodden grasslands and build that beautiful place, which I did. I
put lots of lakes in it with 50 good dams, so everywhere there’s
water, and I created paradise.  It created itself even more than I did;
I gave it a three-year start. It built itself amazingly fast.

SV: It’s a frustrating thing for us. I never could have cleared that field
where my garden is. It just never would have happened. It was a
deep, dark pine forest. I never even thought about going in there.
Then one day, it was gone, and all of a sudden, there was sky and a
whole new vision occurred to us and we ended up buying the land.
I’m trying to reforest a little part of the cleared area but the rest of it
I want to keep open for gardens.

BM: Yeah, that’s a bind. If you look at America, there’s more land
cleared than will ever be used to grow food and maybe we need 2%
of the cleared land that now exists to grow all the food we need.
That’s a fair estimate. Some people say 4% in England or
somewhere. You could close 96% of the farms down or 98%,
depending on which way you’re growing your food. Just reforest the
whole thing again.

SV: Do you think that food would be better grown in much smaller
scale and more locally throughout the country?

BM: Food needs to be grown very close to where it’s consumed and
farmers’ markets need to be plentiful. There are very good farmers’
markets throughout the United States. There just aren’t enough of
them. Where I live, they’re not half an hour apart, so you might have
six farmers’ markets you can go to that don’t take you an hour from
where you’re living. So, you need a lot more farmers’ markets and
they should have rules. The people selling there have to have grown
what they’re selling, so that means it’s all grown very close to the
market and, therefore, to the consumer.

The next step is what the Japanese have taken on wholesale: to do
nearly all your marketing via consumer-producer coops. So you have
maybe three farmers to supply 150 homes. In Japan, that’s nearly
the only way food is marketed, so all the consumers know their
farmers; they even know the birthdays of their children. All the
farmers know their consumers as well. They support each other like
crazy. You’ll never win them away from each other. And it’s all
organic, straight from the farm to you. So I think it’s the future of
food. The future of food is here. At the same time that the future of
food is here and you can say that Japan is the way that food will be
distributed in the future and that Vietnam has set the basis of how
food will be produced in the future—it’s adopted total organic
systems—you’ve got some other force which in a sense appears to
be evil, like Aventis  and some of the other big seed companies who
are introducing genetically modified organisms on a broad scale and
deliberately polluting other crops with their pollen. So they’ve just
made a statement: if you don’t want to eat genetically modified food,
you’ve got to stop eating now because we’ve spread it so widely that
you’re going to get it, when we already know that some of the
animals fed on genetically modified potato are showing gross
deformities. So the evil people are trying to spread their evil and
they’re very rich. At the same time, everybody else is trying to get
good food locally produced. So we’re in kind of a desperate battle.
It’s the last battle too, because if they win, it’s the end of all of us.
So, in a sense, we have to win. I say this, if it sounds simple or not:
it’s too late to fail. So the systems you take up should be systems
that work. You just have to be a serious, thinking person doing things
which are going to work.

SV: So establishing local food systems should be a priority.

BM: Everybody should be able to see most of their food out the
window. They should live where you can see the food you eat being
grown. You can’t see it being grown if it’s in Mexico and you don’t
have control over it.

SV: I live in Maine, Bill, and people are buying organic salad greens in
June that are grown in California.

BM:  That’s a bit of nonsense, isn’t it?

SV:  Absolutely crazy, but it seems like, although there’s an obvious
market, nobody around is taking advantage of it.

BM:  The whole world is not like this. If you lived in Russia, every little
town produces all its food and there are no shops. You can’t go down
to the shop and buy a packet of potato.

SV:  I’ve seen it in China. Everywhere you look, there’s food. You
look out the window of the train, there’s bok choi growing all along
the edge of the tracks, on the roofs.

BM:  In the end, you’ll see who can sustain their system, and I say, in
Russia you’re safe, in Vietnam you’re safe, in America you’ll have
trouble to find any food growing. You’d have to run for miles to find
any and you’re not safe here.

SV:  I must say, in Maine, a lot of people do grow a lot of food in the
summer. Everybody has a garden, especially the old-timers. The
young kids don’t want anything to do with it.

BM:  Maine’s a bit more old-fashioned, isn’t it, than California?

SV:  Yes it is. People have gardens. They grow their corn, their
potatoes...

BM:  I guess in a sense we choose our own fates. If you want to fuse
off the end with no hope of recovery, you behave in a certain way.

SV:  It seems like the forces of evil that you’re talking about are part
of a whole system that creates this model. We’re being told what’s
cool in the culture and growing food isn’t cool, you know.

BM:  It’s extremely cool in Japan.

SV:  I feel like it’s our job to make it cool here too, so that people will
start doing it. Young kids will say, “Wow. That’s a life that I’m
interested in.”

BM:  I’ve been teaching permaculture for 25 years and what I find is
that younger and younger people come to classes. As they go for
two weeks, and we teach about seven hours a day, they have to be
about 13 before they can stay awake through a course, but we are
graduating more 13-year-olds now than we ever have. The
grandchildren of my first students are coming.

SV:  Well that certainly gives us some hope for the future!  How do
you feel about the conversion of organic agriculture to a larger scale?

BM:  Let me say it again: you want local farmers’ markets. You want
farmer/consumer cooperatives. And really, there are a lot of
countries in which that’s happening. I think if you’ve sold out as much
as America has to the money system, you’ve sort of signed your
own death warrants, really. But surely to God that’s not really what
America is, is it, money? It’s what I hear people talking about it more
here than anywhere else in the world. I can’t believe that they really
believe they can eat money.

It’s nice to go to Japan and find the whole country going over to
really tight farmer-to-consumer systems and their big coops are
purely organic, too.

SV:  It is frustrating because it just seems like what you’re fighting
against is this huge machine that has so much clout . . .

BM:  I remember once, I had trained 3000 people and then I found
that one of your companies had 30,000 graduate engineers. (laughs)
I realized how puny I was! But that was a long time ago and I’ve
trained a couple of thousand more people and they’ve trained
hundreds of thousands of others, so we are much bigger than any
company now and we are spreading. And the point is that we don’t
lose anybody to them, but boy, they’re losing a lot of people to us.

SV: What do you think are our biggest tools to make this change to
more sustainable development?

BM: The biggest tool we have is education: to teach people how to
garden, to teach people how to market, to teach people how to set
up their own credit unions, to teach people how to set up their
businesses without capital—we do that. And you know, for the last
15 years of my life I’ve kind of been out of touch with the West
because I figure that America can do what it likes. It can find out how
to do something and it can put it into place. India’s not like that.
There are too many outcasts, too many marginalized people, so I go
there, and Africa and South America, and I prefer to teach where the
need is great. The changes are huge from my teaching.

SV: It seems like one of the problems is that because of the way that
we are living here, so energy<delete>intensive, using inordinate
amounts of the world’s resources, we’re creating these situations
that you’re then going out to mitigate. In some ways, we’re mining
the resources, we’re keeping the people poor...

BM: That may be true in South America. It’s not true in India. The
caste system kept a lot of people down there.

SV: But don’t you think the Western agricultural model has gone into
places like India and just thrown their local agriculture on its head?

BM: In fairly modern times, but most of the agriculture is still there.
Land ownership was badly skewed. It was nearly as bad as it is here.
I think there’s something like 3% of the people own 90% of the land,
much like America. And that was upper caste people.

SV: Don’t you think that the Novartises and Monsantos have their
sights set on these places, to go and install their model of chemical
and biotech based agriculture? Buy this seed. Buy this fertilizer. Buy
this pesticide. This is the new model. Forget about all the diversity of
pulses and grains that you’ve been growing for centuries... you don’t
need those anymore, you need this higher yield, mono-crop model.

BM: (laughs)

SV: We’re imposing that on whole cultures...

BM: It’s true. But at the same time, what the individual Indian farmer
is saying is, “We went down that track and it doesn’t work.” And they
almost all say, “My soil died when I went modern and sprayed,” and
they can’t stand the thought that they’ve killed their soil. There’s no
more crabs in the fields; there’s no more birds; and we’re not going
that way anymore. And so, they’re uprooting the “modern” crops
and chucking them into the hedgerow and going back to the older
methods and the older systems. When you try that stuff, the Green
Revolution stuff, it doesn’t take you long to decide that it’s not good
for anybody.

SV: Have you done any work in Cuba?

BM: No, But I’m proud to say that my students have done a lot. They
found what they called the “Green Team” and went into Cuba and
apparently have done a lot with home gardens and community
gardens. I told them not to take any notice of... what’s his name...
Fidel because he’s a notorious brown thumb. Fidel decided to plant
only sugar cane, you know, and left them in such a mess.

SV: I went down there in 1997, and we brought 25 copies of your
Introduction to Permaculture  in Spanish. Most of the Farmers knew
about permaculture and were very grateful for the information. They
are very smart about creating new permaculture models suited to
their environment.

BM: Well, take Vietnam. We went in there at a critical point when
they weren’t finished, the army was being immobilized; all the
soldiers were becoming farmers but some had been fighting for 40
years so they didn’t know much about farming. So I went in and just
traveled slowly through the country. Some of my students had been
teaching courses and reported being overwhelmed with requests for
courses. And then, the people who controlled the country said to me,
“Could we have your book, Introduction to Permaculture.” I said,
“What do you plan?” They said, “We’re going to translate it into
Vietnamese and give it out, free to the farmers, and tell them that’s
our policy now because it’s organic and it works for what’s there. We
don’t have the money to bring in a lot of other stuff.” I said, “Of
course you can.” So they printed 140,000, gave one to every
farmer, and said, “This is it. We’re going organic.” And so they did.

But, I forgot and they forgot that my photograph’s on the back
cover. Now, every farmer in Vietnam knows me. No matter where I
am, “Hi Bill!” I don’t know if he’s Nu or Nuan or what his name is, but
it’s strange to be named by everybody in the most remote areas.
And they rub my tummy for good luck ‘cause I look like a longevity
god. So in all the markets... my wife didn’t believe me until she came
with me... little hands come under my arms and rub my tummy and
they think I won’t notice too much because I want longevity and I’m
the good luck man...

SV: Sounds like woo woo to me!

BM: Well, that’s woo woo I don’t mind
 them rubbing my tummy if it
gives them comfort. It doesn’t do anything for me, I gotta say. So
they’re great now, the Vietnamese farmers. They’re probably the
ones who have pushed permaculture as far as you can.

SV: Really? Out of necessity? I’m sure, like Cuba, that they can’t
afford to bring in all these chemical inputs.

BM: Of course, in after me came Takao Furuno, so now they can
grow all their rice without any fertilizers too. So between Furuno and
me, we sort of did it.

SV: So, if you get in there before the Monsantos and the Novartises
get in there, you can set up these systems that can resist...

BM: I have to say that once we’ve been in, the resistance to those is
total, and, I repeat,  some of them are joining us but none of us are
joining them. I’ve been working throughout southern Africa and my
students are working throughout eastern Africa. My African students
are in their seventh generation of teachers.

SV: You’re talking about building self-reliance and that allows them to
resist these other models that are going to be imposed on them from
outside...

BM: ... and to know they’re coming and to know what it will do. I tell
them not to accept anything but OP (open pollinated) seed, stick to
their own local seed systems, on and on and on. Be organic. I’ve built
nations of fanatics (laughs) for sensible living! They’re fanatic about
sensible and sustainable systems.

First, I never set off on foot to save the world. I set off to educate
those who want to be educated in sustainable systems and I ask
every class: would they teach others? Not all of them did, but some
of them did very well. So, I’m not somebody who is pretending to
save the world or that I have saved the world; I have simply
developed a system... where I’ve put permaculture in place, they’re
OK. Where I haven’t, they’re pretty well buggered.

SV: But it seems like it’s getting to the point now with genetic
engineering that people can “bugger” up our own organic agriculture,
you know, even our open pollinated seeds...

BM: I think in America, most people accept GMOs. In fact, there’s
nobody here that won’t carry them, right? That’s not true in Europe
or the rest of the world. Australia, you can’t do it. You can’t sell them.
So there’s no sense in planting something you can’t sell. So America
is increasingly being left out on a limb. Not just with GMOs but with a
whole lot of other things. As I say, you elected the wrong president.
You might find you’re the only people in the world doing certain things
in a very short time. And the only people in the world not <delete
space> eating organic food. I think that will be the case. I think the
third world is changing very fast and cooperating.

I’m very impressed with the Vietnamese. I went to see a farmer, Mr.
Man is his name, he had adopted permaculture but his wife didn’t
agree with him. She just wanted to grow rice. So he said, you take
half the farm and I’ll take half. So they did and that’s how it looks.
Half the farm is just rice, grown with chemicals. Half the farm is like
the Garden of Eden. He was able to sell very large quantities of food
at the local market, whereas she was competing in a world rice
market and wasn’t doing too good. So she didn’t make much money.
She was working hard, but didn’t make any money. He made a lot of
money. He bought a bike for himself and they bought a black-and-
white television set and a radio. He’s a rich farmer. Then he had a
$400 surplus. So what did he do? He gave it to the farmer next door
so he could do the same. It’s very un-American, isn’t it?

SV: Entirely.

We have a food cooperative in our town. After 25 years we moved
our little store that was tucked away in a back alley out onto Main
Street. Somebody had a workshop for our Grand Opening that was
titled “Is there Enough Food for Everyone?” It turns out that, even
though the food is there, there are lots of people who are going
hungry because they don’t know how to cook whole food. If they
can’t buy processed food then they won’t cook rice or beans.

BM: In little towns up in Queensland, that’s where our cooperatives
got up and got going. We put the credit union there too and the credit
union is for everyone in the town. It started with an average
investment of $15 each and it now stands at about $18,000 each
and it grew so fast. Everybody bought their own houses, bought their
own cars, bought their own farms, set up their own businesses, and
they had a huge surplus: I think it’s about 15-20 million bucks. It’s
only a little town. And nobody wants any capital anymore. They’re all
fully capitalized. And they did it with their own money! It’s amazing
what your little town could be like if you put your credit union with
your coop.

SV: It seems like the core problem for us is basically that no one
wants to do much physical work. Maybe if we can teach more
permaculture techniques to show that it’s not about going out there
and toiling and digging and shoveling...

BM: Like growing everything in mulch.

SV: Great idea, although it doesn’t always work where we live. We
can’t keep mulch on our soil all year round because it takes too long
for the soil to warm up in the spring. We have to get our mulch off so
the soil can dry out and warm up. We get lots of slugs living under the
mulch if we’re not careful too. It’s a little tricky.

BM: A lot of duck food. You do have a slight excess of duck
deficiency. I’m sure it’s true that you can’t do this and you can’t do
that but look to what you can do...

SV: Exactly. It seems like one of the principles of permaculture would
be for every single situation, there’s a unique solution.

BM: Yes, that might be true, but you apply the same things. I
remember when we were in Hawaii dealing with Cauceria grass. You
couldn’t plant a tree; it just went over it and killed it. And so I said,
“OK, is that one of your big problems?” They said, “yes, that’s a big
problem.” I said, “go out, observe it—where it is and where it
isn’t—and come back and tell me under what conditions you don’t get
Cauceria  grass.” They did that. Then, we drew up a system; we
thought we could plant an instant garden with no Cauceria in the
middle of Cauceria. And we did. We planted it and it grew.

SV: So observation is the starting point in any permaculture project?

BM: Right
 No, it’s the starting point for a lot of techniques that
we’ve worked out. The starting point for any permaculture project is
someone who wants to start the project.

SV: But once you decide you want to start the project, say you want
to take over your backyard which is 3/4 of an acre of lawn that
you’ve been mowing for 20 years and all of a sudden you want to
look at it in a different way, you need to go out and observe what’s
going on in that environment.

BM: Yes, certainly


There was never any book on the design of natural systems or
agriculture. Every book on agriculture is a book on technique. There
are none on design. Permaculture is the first book ever on the design
of agricultural and architectural systems. So it didn’t have any
precursors. It sort of sprang like dragon’s teeth, new out of the
ground. It had to also define what design was. Now that was difficult,
because nobody defined design. So, the only way we could do that is
to define practical design, utilitarian design, because if you left
“utilitarian” out, you can call anything design. But you can’t if you’re
not achieving something. Utilitarian design is what we do. Functional
design. So then, you define design, methods of design. There are six
or eight methods given to you by which you can design. All lead to
good design and we suggest you use some of all of them.

When I wrote Permaculture, I didn’t think I was the first person to
write it or teach it. I thought, there must be a lot of people much
better than me to do it. Nobody ever did. So I kept on teaching it and
my students kept on teaching it and their students as well. I thought
eventually, they’ll imitate it. Only in recent years have people actually
imitated it.

I can give you a list of institutions in America who have asked me to
hand it over and most of them have done really awful work, you
know.

SV: It’s such a stupid question to begin with...

BM: Isn’t it a funny idea? Couldn’t they go out and invent sustainable
systems for themselves? I mean, they all have PhDs and big salaries
and tons of time. They could employ people to research
sustainability. Some of them have grants of $6 million. Agriculture
Departments have started to disappear in areas where there’s a lot
of permaculture because they don’t want what the Ag Department
has to sell. What the Ag Department had to sell for most of history
was poison... they have no future, nor do other people like Monsanto
or Novartis. They have no future. They’ll be looked upon as a horrible
mistake.

SV: How do we make that happen faster?

BM: Sue them.

SV: How can you sue them? Their pockets are so incredibly deep that
they can hire all these lawyers.  Monsanto’s got a hell of a lot of
money.

BM: Where do they get it from?

SV: (long pause) Good question. They got it from selling us
something. That’s the power they have: to sell. They can sell this
industrial food system through advertising. You flip on a television in
this country, everyone has one...

BM: A very strong thing happened in Japan. Japan buys its rice off
Japanese growers because they grow the varieties of rice the
Japanese know and love. And now they’re growing it organically
through the use of ducks. It’s got a duck on the packet: duck rice. So
it’s beyond organic. It’s time we all went beyond organic.

SV: How do we sell it?

BM: You sell it to people who know your farm and know you. There’s
no problem to Furuno because all the people he sells to visit his farm
all the time.

Anyhow, the Japanese love their rice and they love the rice that their
farmers grow organically for them - the duck rice. So America and
Australia have a big trade deficit with Japan. They said to the
Japanese, “you’ve got to buy our rice. It’s going to be a lot cheaper
for your customers,” and they said, “All right, we’ll take 80,000 bags
a year.” So they built these great big warehouses at Nagoya and all
this rice came in from Australia and the United Kingdom and first, they
tried grinding it up and making biscuits for the army but the army
didn’t like them. So, they couldn’t get anyone to buy it as rice
because they didn’t like that rice and they knew it wasn’t organic. So
they bought even bigger storage sheds and then they decided that
it’s too expensive. So now they’ve got the solution. They put it
through a little screw feed and blow it into electric generators or
furnaces, generating steam for electricity. They say it’s quite good as
fuel.

SV: Expensive fuel.

BM: Yeah. Well, it’s not as expensive as building more and more
storage to keep Americans and Australians happy about rice. No one
in Japan will ever eat it. Ever. They can do market research until their
ass drops off. They won’t be able to sell a grain of that rice to any
Japanese person. Because rice is almost a holy thing to them. But
now, Feruno, he could run 7000 acres and sell all the rice because he
sells the right sort of rice, beautifully made, beautifully done,
packaged nicely, put in your hand by your farmer. I’ll buy that.

SV: So what makes the Japanese different? Why don’t we have that
same mentality here? Why don’t we care about our food?

BM: I think one thing is very obvious: you don’t come from a single
cultural stem. There’s nothing like rice coming to all of you. In fact,
rice is common to nobody except the Japanese, who were here
before you put them in prison. The Chinese, perhaps. So, if anything,
this is a wheat society. Increasingly, it’s becoming a soybean society.
And the root crops are sold only locally.

SV:  Michael Pollen told an interesting story on the radio recently,
He’s written this book called The Botany of Desire, which we sell on
our website. When he was researching the book he grew some of
these GMO potatoes he writes about. He just never ate them. He
had other potatoes that weren’t GMO. He grew them just to see
what they looked like, as research. He was going to a potluck picnic
and he cooked a whole bunch of these potatoes to make potato
salad and then he started thinking, “if I bring this potato salad, I’m
going to have to tell everybody that these are GMO potatoes and if I
do, and there’s somebody else that has potato salad, everybody’s
going to eat the other potato salad.” And he had this revelation about
why they won’t label GMO food. It’s so obvious that people don’t
really want to eat it.

BM: Really, you’ve got two foods: tomatoes. This one says,
“Poisoned.” What are you gonna buy?

SV: You’re gonna buy the non-GMO. Always.

BM: Always. I think there should be a class of people like all those
who work for those big (Biotech) firms who are force-fed on GMO
food.

SV: But we’re all eating it.

BM: Tasmania hasn’t got any...

SV: I mean in this country at least.

BM: ... and it’s banned them for the future.

SV: Any soy product... if it’s not organic soymilk, it’s GMO. Tofu. It’s
GMO. Stuff that we always thought of as our “natural foods” are now
being made with GMO soybeans.

BM: I believe that.

SV: It’s come in under the radar. No one really understood, they just
kind of foisted it on us before anybody really knew.

BM:: Bastards, aren’t they?

SV: 70% of our soybeans, or something like that, are GMO, and I
don’t think that most of us understand what we’re supporting when
we buy these products.  It’s like buy non-organic corn chips now that
they’ve bred BT into corn plants.

BM: Well that’s the end of BT. Years ago they brought some seed
into Australia to grow cotton which is BT-inoculated, GMO seed, and
they sowed it and the boll weevil wiped out half the crop because it
didn’t work. And now all the seed is from that BT-immune group.
That might be a way to sort of finish off BT.

SV: I think you might be right and that’s the primary pesticide that
organic growers have to use. It’s gonna become worthless in five
years because pests are building resistance to it.

BM: I had an extraordinary occasion once. The Sierra Club was
meeting on Maui. I was on Maui giving a course and they asked me if
I would come one evening and address them and I said sure. It
occurred to me while I was traveling there that there were pretty well-
off people in the Sierra Club and they might have something to say
about what they are investing in. I asked them, “Could some of them
who have investments  stay and talk to me?” And they had their
money in tanks and armaments. You know, the Sierra Club is a
conservationist club, but their money is not telling a conservationist
story. I said, “water tanks?” “No, no,” they said, “military tanks.” I
said, “Shit! What are you doing putting your money there?” So, I
think one should say, “Do you put your money where your heart is?”

SV: It’s a big battle.

BM: I agree. I’ve given it all I’ve got for 25 years. And I’ve changed a
fair bit.

SV:  Yes you have.

BM:  But I didn’t promise to save the world. To help it, we’ve all got
to get into the battle.

SV:  But how do we recruit? How do we recruit the younger
generations?

BM:  Well,  I’ve trained lots of people in Australia, and within days of
finishing training, they take off to Ecuador and they’ll turn up doing
something up the side of a mountain. And, mainly, they are young,
within a few years of 20. So, they’re all over the place, you know,
Borneo and Timor and Macedonia looking after refugees. They’re just
everywhere. I meet them occasionally and I say to them, “My God.
When you’re old, you’re going to be so pleased with these few years
you’ve put in helping. What a great adventure you’ve had that most
young people haven’t.”

SV:  Exactly.

BM:  I say, “It’s tremendous that you’ve had this adventure. And
you’re only 24.”

SV:  It’s adventure with a purpose: traveling and workin...

BM: Lots of students to follow up on. Two young people, very young,
boy and girlfriend, went to a class and took off for Borneo because of
the rain forest trees. They wanted to go and protest the logging in
Borneo. So they got to Borneo and they got up the river and they
got with the Dyak or somebody and they said, “We’re starving.”
“Well, why are you starving?” “Because they’ve cut down all our
forest where we get our food.” They said, “we know how to grow
food.” So they stopped there and showed them how to grow food
and a year later, they had lots of bananas and papayas and mangoes
and this and that. They said, “we’ve got to get on. We didn’t come
here to show you how to grow food.” They said, “If you leave us, we
will die.”  So they stayed and he eventually got sick of that and came
back to Australia and went into aboriginal work out on a remote
settlement. She married a Dyak and stayed forever and they are now
teaching from settlement to settlement with the Dyaks. Both of them
have totally forgotten about protesting rain forest. That’s happened,
really.

The mess that’s after that, what do you do about that? You can’t
protest the war in Kosovo. It’s happened. You can go and try and
look after those 86,000 people who fled. A lot of the (permaculture)
troops are there. I think they’re great. In Kosovo, the numbers are
up to 200 enrolled in a course. One guy came out and said, “I think
I’ve taught about 10,000 people just in Kosovo.” The courses are
huge and the enthusiasm is phenomenal. Because they’re in a mess.
And you know, you can eat or believe anything you like in America
because it really doesn’t matter. You’re not in much of a mess. Yet.
But down in the Bronx, people listen very intently, and down in Watts,
they do too. The Hawaiians do. So, the minorities in America and the
native Americans have set up their own teaching groups. They go
from tribe to tribe teaching. So, I have done work here, you know.

SV:  Any last words of wisdom for us Bill?

BM: There are no such things, really. Anybody who makes up their
mind can make huge difference. People who can’t make up their
minds make no difference at all. And yes, it’s incredibly simple: I
remember myself, I just determined one day I would go and teach
this system. And I did.

SV:  All we can do is work and hope. I have a lot more hope after
talking to you today. Thank you.
.....................................................................

SEEDS OF CHANGE HAS BECOME A DISTRIBUTOR OF
PERMACULTURE BOOKS

http://click.mars-inc.com/UM/T.asp?A17.61.8.18.548

“A Designer's Manual" is the bible of the worldwide permaculture
movement.  Having become U.S. distributors of Tagari books, we are
pleased to be able to offer this and other Permaculture books for
special reduced prices. Our hope is to speed the dissemination of
these important concepts throughout North America where poor
design and planning leads us to squander inordinately vast amounts
of the world's resources.

Books by Bill Mollison

"Permaculture: A Designer's Manual" (hardcover) Tagari Publishing,
576 pages (regular price $50) Special Offer on our website, $33.25

This book is about designing sustainable human settlements, and
preserving and extending natural systems. It covers aspects of
designing and maintaining a cultivated ecology in any climate: the
principles of design; design methods; understanding patterns in
nature; climatic factors; water; soils; earthworks; techniques and
strategies in the different climatic types; aquaculture; and the social,
legal, and economic design of human settlement.

It calls into question not only the current methods of agriculture but
also the very need for a formal food agriculture if wastelands and the
excessive lawn culture within towns and cities are devoted to food
production and small livestock suited to local needs.

The world can no longer sustain the damage caused by modern
agriculture, monocultural forestry, and thoughtless settlement design,
and in the near future we will see the end of wasted energy, or the
end of civilization as we know it, due to human-caused pollution and
climate changes.

Strategies for the necessary changes in social investment policy,
politics itself, and towards regional or village self-reliance are now
desperately needed, and examples of these strategies are given. It is
hoped that this manual will open the global debate that must never
end, and so give a guide to the form of a future in which our children
have at least a chance of a reasonable existence. - Bill Mollison,
Prologue, Permaculture A Designer's Manual
http://store.yahoo.com/seedsofchange/perdesman.html

"Introduction to Permaculture" covers the fundamentals (softcover)
Tagari Publishing, 216 pages $15.20

"Permaculture Two," Tagari Publishing $17.10

"The Permaculture book of Ferment and Human Nutrition," Tagari
Publishing, 288 pages, 35 color photographs,  (hardcover) $22.80
(Softcover $17.10)

This amazing and invaluable book about fermentation and fermented
foods compiles preservation and storage methods, recipes, and other
<fermentation?> information from all over the world. The book
covers a broad array of foods, ranging from dairy products and red
meats, to fish, fruits and vegetables, to cockroaches and
grasshoppers. Humorously irreverent and immensely passionate, Mr.
Mollison infuses the work with a keen critique of the modern food
system. Mollison asks, If cultures abandon the foods that have
sustained them for millennia and replace these foods with ones that
are fast and convenient but sicken them with diseases such as
diabetes, cancer, or heart disease, then aren't these cultures killing
themselves? Generally, the processes and recipes described in the
book are not meant to be staples to the diet. Instead, they are
intended only as accents, to provide much of the trace minerals,
vitamins, and other essential nutrients that are deficient in modern
processed foods.

The book begins by explaining storage and preservation methods.
Next, Mollison examines foods by group and details the added
nutritional values resulting from fermentation and various recipes and
preparation methods. For example, in his discussion of tempeh
(fermented soybeans), Mollison explains that tempeh, which is
produced from a Rhizoporus oligosporus mold, contains "47%
protein with double the riboflavin and seven times the niacin of
soybeans." The reference section lists sources for the inoculant.

Mollison also details many unusual foods and some of their history
and extraordinary uses. For example, he points out that "Australian
war prisoners remained alive in prison camps in Southeast Asia by
eating cockroaches with their rice, fermenting the rice with koji. They
also allowed maggots to eat their wounds clean (and to secrete an
anti-bacterial substance in the wounds). All cockroaches are edible,
and (with rats) represent the largest biomass production of cities like
New York and Sydney. They may be preferable to cannibalism in hard
times." (page 184)

"The Permaculture Book of Ferment and Nutrition" is packed with
thousands of facts and details that inform and astound the reader. I
learned a great deal more than I ever thought possible about
fermented foods. This book will amaze you with the varieties
available to us, and how much more nutritious our limited diets could
be. - Emily Skelton
http://store.yahoo.com/seedsofchange/perdesman.html



------- End of forwarded message -------
_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture