"The policy
set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other
GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must." - Whole
Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011
In the wake of a 12-year battle to keep Monsanto's Genetically
Engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation's 25,000
organic farms and ranches, America's organic consumers and
producers are facing betrayal. A self-appointed cabal
of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole
Foods Market, Organic
Valley, and Stonyfield
Farm, has decided it's time to surrender to Monsanto.
Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that
they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops,
such as Monsanto's controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are
prepared to sit down and cut a deal for "coexistence" with
Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.
In a cleverly worded, but profoundly
misleading email sent to its customers last week, Whole
Foods Market, while proclaiming their support for organics and
"seed purity," gave the green light to USDA bureaucrats to
approve the "conditional deregulation" of Monsanto's genetically
engineered, herbicide-resistant alfalfa. Beyond the regulatory
euphemism of "conditional deregulation," this means that WFM and
their colleagues are willing to go along with the massive
planting of a chemical and energy-intensive GE perennial crop,
alfalfa; guaranteed to spread its mutant genes and seeds across
the nation; guaranteed to contaminate the alfalfa fed to organic
animals; guaranteed to lead to massive poisoning of farm workers
and destruction of the essential soil food web by the toxic
herbicide, Roundup; and guaranteed to produce Roundup-resistant
superweeds that will require even more deadly herbicides such as
2,4 D to be sprayed on millions of acres of alfalfa across the
U.S.
In exchange for allowing Monsanto's premeditated pollution of
the alfalfa gene pool, WFM wants "compensation." In exchange for
a new assault on farmworkers and rural communities (a recent
large-scale Swedish study found that spraying Roundup doubles
farm workers' and rural residents' risk of getting cancer), WFM
expects the pro-biotech USDA to begin to regulate rather than
cheerlead for Monsanto. In payment for a new broad spectrum
attack on the soil's crucial ability to provide nutrition for
food crops and to sequester dangerous greenhouse gases (recent
studies show that Roundup devastates essential soil
microorganisms that provide plant nutrition and sequester
climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases), WFM wants the Biotech
Bully of St. Louis to agree to pay "compensation" (i.e. hush
money) to farmers "for any losses related to the contamination
of his crop."
In its email
of Jan. 21, 2011 WFM calls for "public oversight by the
USDA rather than reliance on the biotechnology industry," even
though WFM knows full well that federal regulations on
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) do not require pre-market
safety testing, nor labeling; and that even federal judges have
repeatedly ruled that so-called government "oversight" of
Frankencrops such as Monsanto's sugar beets and alfalfa is
basically a farce. At the end of its email, WFM admits that its
surrender to Monsanto is permanent: "The policy set for GE
alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as
well True coexistence is a must."
Why Is Organic Inc. Surrendering?
According to informed sources, the CEOs of WFM and Stonyfield
are personal friends of former Iowa governor, now USDA
Secretary, Tom Vilsack, and in fact made financial contributions
to Vilsack's previous electoral campaigns. Vilsack was hailed as
"Governor of the Year" in 2001 by the Biotechnology Industry
Organization, and traveled in a Monsanto corporate jet on the
campaign trail. Perhaps even more fundamental to Organic Inc.'s
abject surrender is the fact that the organic elite has become
more and more isolated from the concerns and passions of organic
consumers and locavores. The Organic Inc. CEOs are tired of
activist pressure, boycotts, and petitions. Several of them have
told me this to my face. They apparently believe that the battle
against GMOs has been lost, and that it's time to reach for the
consolation prize. The consolation prize they seek is a
so-called "coexistence" between the biotech Behemoth and the
organic community that will lull the public to sleep and
greenwash the unpleasant fact that Monsanto's unlabeled and
unregulated genetically engineered crops are now spreading their
toxic genes on 1/3 of U.S. (and 1/10 of global) crop land.
WFM and most of the largest organic companies have deliberately
separated themselves from anti-GMO efforts and cut off all
funding to campaigns working to label or ban GMOs. The so-called Non-GMO Project, funded by Whole
Foods and giant wholesaler United Natural Foods (UNFI) is
basically a greenwashing effort (although the 100% organic
companies involved in this project seem to be operating in good
faith) to show that certified organic foods are basically free
from GMOs (we already know this since GMOs are banned in organic
production), while failing to focus on so-called "natural"
foods, which constitute most of WFM and UNFI's sales and are
routinely contaminated with GMOs.
From their "business as usual" perspective, successful lawsuits
against GMOs filed by public interest groups such as the Center
for Food Safety; or noisy attacks on Monsanto by groups like the
Organic Consumers Association, create bad publicity, rattle
their big customers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Kroger, Costco,
Supervalu, Publix and Safeway; and remind consumers that organic
crops and foods such as corn, soybeans, and canola are slowly
but surely becoming contaminated by Monsanto's GMOs.
Whole Food's Dirty Little Secret: Most of the
So-Called "Natural" Processed Foods and Animal Products They
Sell Are Contaminated with GMOs
The main reason, however, why Whole Foods is pleading for
coexistence with Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, BASF and the
rest of the biotech bullies, is that they desperately want the
controversy surrounding genetically engineered foods and crops
to go away. Why? Because they know, just as we do, that 2/3 of
WFM's $9 billion annual sales is derived from so-called
"natural" processed foods and animal products that are
contaminated with GMOs. We and our allies have tested their
so-called "natural" products (no doubt WFM's lab has too)
containing non-organic corn and soy, and guess what: they're all
contaminated with GMOs, in contrast to their certified organic
products, which are basically free of GMOs, or else contain
barely detectable trace amounts.
Approximately 2/3 of the products sold by Whole Foods Market and
their main distributor, United Natural Foods (UNFI) are not
certified organic, but rather are conventional
(chemical-intensive and GMO-tainted) foods and products
disguised as "natural."
Unprecedented wholesale and retail control of the organic
marketplace by UNFI and Whole Foods, employing a business model
of selling twice as much so-called "natural" food as certified
organic food, coupled with the takeover
of many organic companies by multinational food corporations
such as Dean Foods, threatens the growth of the organic
movement.
Covering Up GMO Contamination: Perpetrating
"Natural" Fraud
Many well-meaning consumers are confused about the difference
between conventional products marketed as "natural," and those
nutritionally/environmentally superior and climate-friendly
products that are "certified organic."
Retail stores like WFM and wholesale distributors like UNFI have
failed to educate their customers about the qualitative
difference between natural and certified organic, conveniently
glossing over the fact that nearly all of the processed
"natural" foods and products they sell contain GMOs, or else
come from a "natural" supply chain where animals are force-fed
GMO grains in factory farms or Confined Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFOs).
A troubling trend in organics today is the calculated shift on
the part of certain large formerly organic brands from certified
organic ingredients and products to so-called "natural"
ingredients. With the exception of the "grass-fed and
grass-finished" meat sector, most "natural" meat, dairy, and
eggs are coming from animals reared on GMO grains and drugs, and
confined, entirely, or for a good portion of their lives, in
CAFOs.
Whole Foods and UNFI are maximizing their profits by selling
quasi-natural products at premium organic prices. Organic
consumers are increasingly left without certified organic
choices while genuine organic farmers and ranchers continue to
lose market share to "natural" imposters. It's no wonder that
less than 1% of American farmland is certified organic, while
well-intentioned but misled consumers have boosted organic and
"natural" purchases to $80 billion annually-approximately 12% of
all grocery store sales.
The Solution: Truth-in-Labeling Will Enable
Consumers to Drive So-Called "Natural" GMO and CAFO-Tainted
Foods Off the Market
There can be no such thing as "coexistence" with a reckless
industry that undermines public health, destroys biodiversity,
damages the environment, tortures and poisons animals,
destabilizes the climate, and economically devastates the
world's 1.5 billion seed-saving small farmers. There is no such
thing as coexistence between GMOs and organics in the European
Union. Why? Because in the EU there are almost no GMO crops
under cultivation, nor GM consumer food products on supermarket
shelves. And why is this? Because under EU law, all foods
containing GMOs or GMO ingredients must be labeled. Consumers
have the freedom to choose or not to choose GMOs; while farmers,
food processors, and retailers have (at least legally) the right
to lace foods with GMOs, as long as they are safety-tested and
labeled. Of course the EU food industry understands that
consumers, for the most part, do not want to purchase or consume
GE foods. European farmers and food companies, even junk food
purveyors like McDonald's and Wal-Mart, understand quite well
the concept expressed by a Monsanto executive when GMOs first
came on the market: "If you put a label on genetically
engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on
it."
The biotech industry and Organic Inc. are supremely conscious of
the fact that North American consumers, like their European
counterparts, are wary and suspicious of GMO foods. Even without
a PhD, consumers understand you don't want your food safety or
environmental sustainability decisions to be made by
out-of-control chemical companies like Monsanto, Dow, or Dupont
- the same people who brought you toxic pesticides, Agent
Orange, PCBs, and now global warming. Industry leaders are
acutely aware of the fact that every single industry or
government poll over the last 16 years has shown that 85-95% of
American consumers want mandatory labels on GMO foods. Why? So
that we can avoid buying them. GMO foods have absolutely no
benefits for consumers or the environment, only hazards. This is
why Monsanto and their friends in the Bush, Clinton, and Obama
administrations have prevented consumer GMO truth-in-labeling
laws from getting a public discussion in Congress.
Although Congressman Dennis Kucinich (Democrat, Ohio) recently
introduced a bill in Congress calling for mandatory labeling and
safety testing for GMOs, don't hold your breath for Congress to
take a stand for truth-in-labeling and consumers' right to know
what's in their food. Especially since the 2010 Supreme Court
decision in the so-called "Citizens United" case gave big
corporations and billionaires the right to spend unlimited
amounts of money (and remain anonymous, as they do so) to buy
media coverage and elections, our chances of passing federal GMO
labeling laws against the wishes of Monsanto and Food Inc. are
all but non-existent. Perfectly dramatizing the "Revolving
Door" between Monsanto and the Federal Government, Supreme
Court Justice Clarence Thomas, formerly chief counsel for
Monsanto, delivered one of the decisive votes in the Citizens
United case, in effect giving Monsanto and other biotech bullies
the right to buy the votes it needs in the U.S. Congress.
With big money controlling Congress and the media, we have
little choice but to shift our focus and go local. We've got to
concentrate our forces where our leverage and power lie, in the
marketplace, at the retail level; pressuring retail food stores
to voluntarily label their products; while on the legislative
front we must organize a broad coalition to pass mandatory GMO
(and CAFO) labeling laws, at the city, county, and state levels.
The Organic Consumers Association, joined by our consumer,
farmer, environmental, and labor allies, has just launched a
nationwide Truth-in-Labeling
campaign to stop Monsanto and the Biotech Bullies from
force-feeding unlabeled GMOs to animals and humans.
Utilizing scientific data, legal precedent, and consumer power
the OCA and our local coalitions will educate and mobilize at
the grassroots level to pressure giant supermarket chains
(Wal-Mart, Kroger, Costco, Safeway, Supervalu, and Publix) and
natural food retailers such as Whole Foods and Trader Joe's to
voluntarily implement "truth-in-labeling" practices for GMOs and
CAFO products; while simultaneously organizing a critical mass
to pass mandatory local and state truth-in-labeling ordinances -
similar to labeling laws already in effect for country of
origin, irradiated food, allergens, and carcinogens. If local
and state government bodies refuse to take action, wherever
possible we must attempt to gather sufficient petition
signatures and place these truth-in-labeling initiatives
directly on the ballot in 2011 or 2012. If you're interesting in
helping organize or coordinate a Millions Against Monsanto and
Factory Farms Truth-in-Labeling campaign in your local
community, sign up here: http://organicconsumers.org/oca-volunteer/
To pressure Whole Foods Market and the nation's largest
supermarket chains to voluntarily adopt truth-in-labeling
practices sign here, and circulate this petition widely: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22309.cfm
And please stay tuned to Organic Bytes for the latest
developments in our campaigns.
Power to the People! Not the Corporations!
Ronnie Cummins
Organic Consumers Association
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22449.cfm