http://www.green-technology.org/green_technology_magazine/calgree.htm
In January
2011, a new era of building will begin in California. CALGreen, the
nation's first state-wide green building code, will become
mandatory. Architects, developers, plan checkers, inspectors, building
officials and others involved in designing and approving new
construction will be expected to adhere to new mandatory guidelines on
issues ranging from water efficiency and conservation to indoor air
quality.
In cooperation
with the California Building Standards Commission and the California
Department of Housing and Community Development, Green Technology is
developing a series of training workshops to help raise awareness of
the changes that CALGreen will bring and to help building officials
and the design community prepare for implementation.
For the last year, Green Technology has offered sessions on CALGreen
at its events, and at the 2010 Green California Summit the Building
Standards Commission also hosted an information center on the Expo
floor, with experts available to answer code questions. The strong
response to a pre-Summit workshop focused on CALGreen was evidence of
increased awareness of the code and the beginnings of serious efforts
to take stock of necessary operational changes.
"Our
conversations with building officials suggest that at present,
awareness of the code varies greatly from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction," says Green Technology editor in chief Carl Smith.
"It is also apparent that we're entering into new territory in many
ways, from what will be asked of building inspectors to the
documentation necessary to show that paints, flooring or adhesives
meet the new air quality standards."
The first round of
workshops, beginning with a May 20 event http://www.green-technology.org/calgrin
Pasadena, California, will be half-day regional events that offer
basic orientation to the code and an overview of the new provisions.
These will be followed later in the year by a second round of events
offering more in-depth training.
"California is
the first state in the nation to make green building mandatory,"
said Smith. "It's hard to overstate how significant it is that we
are entering an era of healthy, efficient buildings. We consider this
one of the most far-reaching policies the state has enacted, and hope
to work with the Building Standards Commission to develop training
events and materials that help this pioneering effort
succeed."
"The mandatory
provisions of CALGreen go into effect in January and anyone involved
in designing and/or building new commercial or residential structures
in California needs to know about the new requirements," said
Dave Walls, executive director of the California Building Standards
Commission. "We are pleased to be working with Green Technology
in their implementation of CALGreen educational programs that will
reach stakeholders throughout the state."
For updates on the CALGreen initiative, visit
www.green-technology.org/CALGreen
To read Green
Technology's interview with Dave Walls, executive director of the
California Building Standards Commission, click here.
By Racquel
Palmese
He's been called a maverick, a game changer and sometimes just plain
crazy for trying to rewrite the California Building Standards Code to
greatly increase water and energy efficiency standards, to lower the
use of volatile organic compounds (VOC's) in building materials, and
to increase the percentages of construction waste that must be
diverted from landfills. But under a directive from the Governor's
office, Dave Walls, executive director of the California Building
Standards Commission (CBSC), along with a collaborative team of state
agency and industry stakeholders, did just that. The new green
building code, now known by its acronym, CALGreen, has officially been
adopted.
It is the
first-in-the-nation mandatory green building standards code. Voluntary
for the time being, it will become mandatory on January 1, 2011. Once
a building passes the inspection process, the property can then be
labeled as CALGreen compliant.
"This is something no other state in the country has done -
integrating green construction practices into the very fabric of the
construction code," said Tom Sheehy, Acting Secretary of the
California State and Consumer Services Agency and Chair of the
Building Standards Commission. "CALGreen will essentially
revolutionize the way we build structures. By implementing a sensible,
cost-effective foundation of green practices, our state will usher in
a new era of greener communities."
Among the new requirements under CALGreen, every new building in
California will have to reduce water consumption by 20 percent, divert
50 percent of construction waste from landfills and install low VOC
materials. Separate indoor and outdoor water meters for nonresidential
buildings and moisture-sensing irrigation systems for large landscape
projects will be required. There will be mandatory inspections of
energy systems, such as furnaces and air conditioners for
nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet. According to the
California Air Resources Board, the mandatory provisions will reduce
greenhouse gas emissions by 3,000,000 metric tons by 2020.
The unanimous adoption of CALGreen by the CBSC was announced on
January 12. However, leading up to the commission session there was a
powerful pushback effort from environmental and green building groups.
The USGBC, Sierra Club and the National Resources Defense Council
tried to derail it, saying the verification system would be confusing.
Hundreds of architects, engineers and builders sent messages to the
governor opposing the CALGreen label.
In an interview with Green Technology, Walls addresses these concerns, gives the
background of the path to adoption for this groundbreaking work and
discusses how it will be implemented.
California
has taken leadership in green building for years under Governor
Schwarzenegger. How does the new green building code hook up to the
Governor's green prerogatives?
The governor has been taking the lead over the years by signing
legislation such as AB32 [California's Global Warming Act] relating to
greenhouse gas emissions. A big part of that, of course, is a focus on
buildings and reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. He further
directed us to develop and adopt a green building code that would
assist in the effort to affect overall climate change. It really fits
right in with his whole policy and beliefs given the environmental
issues facing our state, our nation, and the world. In 2004 there was
also the Governor's executive order S-20 04, which calls for the greening of all state
government buildings. That kind of kicked off everything that is
happening now.
Would you
give an overview of the California Green Building Standards
Code?
The green building code was specifically designed to reduce the impact
of all buildings in the state on the environment. To do that, we had
to establish a minimum mandatory set of standards that would apply to
all buildings - schools, hospitals, residential occupancies, as well
as commercial facilities. The ultimate goal is to provide a uniform
and consistent code that can be used in coordination with all our
other building codes. Our effort was focused on not only helping local
building officials and governments, but the building industry as well,
to give them something uniform and consistent and a direction they can
head in.
What is the
meaning of the term "CALGreen"?
CALGreen is the
abbreviation for the California Green Building Standards Code, short
for California Green Code. It's what we started calling it, and it
stuck.
What are some
highlights of the new code?
Commissioning
stands out as one of the key components that is not in any other part
of our building codes. Construction waste diversion - that's really
not part of our other building codes either. Those are good examples.
There are reductions in volatile organic compounds [VOCs] content in
materials that are used in the building, also not part of our other
building codes.
Our existing codes
that deal with water reduction in toilets and water fixtures, but in
this code we have combined and ratcheted them down so that the minimum
mandatory requirement will be a 20 percent reduction in indoor potable
water use and 50 percent in landscape irrigation. Those are just a few
of the key elements.
This applies
to new buildings and also refurbished buildings?
Our goal now is to focus on new buildings, so it would not apply to
existing buildings at this time. Our next step will be to include
existing buildings in the green code.
Does the
green code apply to all residential, government and commercial
buildings in California?
All buildings regulated by state code. Federal buildings are exempt;
buildings built on Indian land, or reservations, are exempt. So there
are some exceptions. But yes, ninety-nine point nine percent of the
buildings built in the state are regulated by these codes.
You have been
personally dedicated to developing and implementing CALGreen. In fact,
there were those who said you could never get it done, especially with
all the challenges facing California now. How did it all come
about?
It really came from the administration. They came to us. We update all
of our building codes triennially, every three years. Right after we
completed it three years ago in January, the administration said okay,
now what can you do? Our building codes were kind of behind the
national standards, and once they were updated, immediately the
administration came to us and said, "The governor believes in
greening the environment. What can you do with your codes to move
towards that?" So we looked around and tried to figure out
what we could do and began building from there.
What we couldn't find was another green code out there, which really
surprised me. I'm thinking we're behind the eight ball and we're
going to have to play catch-up, but it wasn't that way. There were a
lot of guidelines out there such as LEED, Green Globes, Build It
Green, Global Green. I think USGBC cites about seventy different
guidelines in the United States alone.
Part of the Governor's direction was to not reinvent the wheel. He
told us to take a look at these programs, glean from them what you
can, and then create a code. That's really what we did. We believe
that's the direction we need to go as a state, as a country, and
even as a world. We need to really make an
impact on the
environment.
What do you
say to people who feel there is doubt about manmade climate change and
that there are so many other things to worry about right now, such as
getting the state's economy back on track?
I know there's a lot of pushback from individuals that don't
believe in climate change, but my argument to that is you can't say
that all the things that are in this code aren't good. How can you
say conserving water is not a good thing? Conserving wood,
steel, all the resources that are out there - how can you say that's
not a good thing? Conserving energy, making buildings more
energy efficient, those are all positive moves regardless of the
politics of climate change. I'm saying for those who don't believe
in it, this is still all positive, and that's how I'm able to keep
pushing this through.
People might
also say that it's not good timing, we can't afford this right
now. What do you say to that?
For all of the mandatory measures we placed in our code, we did a cost
benefit study. So everything shows that you're getting a significant
benefit. If it's indoor air quality improved by reducing volatile
organic compounds, for example, you're going to get a health
benefit. Studies have shown that when there's better air in an
office building for example, you're going to have less sick time and
more productivity. That goes for commercial buildings and for schools
as well.
The other thing is when you save water and energy, you actually can
see that savings in your bill. Ultimately you get a payback on many of
these things. We tried to look very carefully and work with industry
on identifying those very concerns. We didn't make it mandatory to
install solar panels, for example, because there is a high upfront
cost to that. Everything you see in the green code has had a cost
benefit ratio developed for it.
There's
voluntary compliance right now. How are people are receiving
it?
We've had a lot of positive feedback. In fact there are some cities,
such as the city of Irvine and the city of Calabasas that have already
adopted it as mandatory. And there's also an international green
construction code under development. I'm on the committee that is
developing that code, and they are using the California code as a key
resource because we are the only green building code out there right
now.
The code is
voluntary until 2011, when it becomes mandatory. How will this
work?
The way it works is once the Building Standards Commission has
actually adopted the code, which it just has, we then have to
formalize and publish it. This is part of our triennial update of the
California Building Standards Code, so we have to publish the
building, mechanical, plumbing, all the other codes at the same time.
Working with our publishers, they tell us it will take until June or
July. By state law, it only becomes effective 180 days after
publication. The proposed effective date is January 1,
2011.
What happens
when it shifts into mandatory compliance?
I don't think you could ever accomplish any of this without getting
some pushback. There's always someone who's not going to be happy.
We have engaged environmental groups, labor and industry -
architects and engineers also. We've tried to get them involved and
to help them understand the code, and to see what kind of impact it
might have.
Is there somebody who's not paying attention and a year from now
will be saying, "Hey, what happened? What's going on?" I think
there will be. But for the most part, our role is to get the
information out, like we did at the Green California Schools Summit,
like we will be doing at the Green California Summit in March in
Sacramento. We're trying to get the word out as soon as possible as
to what's coming and to help all stakeholders get prepared for it.
Part of that 180 days I'm talking about is to provide manufacturers
and builders a chance to gear up and get ready for all the code
changes, not just the green code.
Almost as
soon as the adoption of CALGreen was announced, there was significant
pushback from some environmental groups. Among the concerns voiced
were that the code's implementation is confusing and that it could
lower standards already voluntarily in place through certification
programs such as the USGBC's LEED system. How would you
respond?
Our proposals were supported by two organizations that have programs
similar to the USGBC's, California Green Builder and Green Building
Initiative/Global Green. However, there were several organizations
that expressed concerns that we did not agree with. It's worth
noting that we did have a lot of support for our positions. For
example, they stated that the code does not have a verification
system, but in fact the code will be subjected to the long-standing,
successful enforcement infrastructure that the state has established
to enforce its health, safety, fire, energy, and structural building
codes. The existing enforcement practices will make verification of
the Green Code for local building inspectors a simple transition.
On the inferiority issue, the state has not worked on a comparison,
and these organizations did not provide information to substantiate
their claims. However, the building industry did state that the
residential provisions are at least equal to existing programs.
Lastly, many stakeholders have stated that the code will provide
clarity to the marketplace and not confusion.
If I'm a
small business, a building contractor, for example, how do I get
trained on complying with the green building code?
We're sending out a newsletter pretty quick, and we'll have it on
our website also. We're getting out to organizations that may
already have training facilities and asking how we can work with them
to get the word out, to get their members and interested parties
trained on building codes issues. We've contacted U.C. Davis, and
we're working with community colleges. We're trying to reach out
as much as we can over this next year. Our focus up until now has been
to get the code adopted, and that's taken a lot of our concentration
and time. Now we will be able to shift that focus towards getting the
education and training out there.
Is the code
available on your website?
The 2008 version
of the code is online for free on our website right now. Now that the
adoption has been done, we are combining all the efforts of the
different agencies and will have the final version online for free for
anybody that wants to look at it. That could be as soon as the end of
January.
What would
you say to builders, architects and contractors who are worried about
the economy and about what it will cost them in time and money to make
these changes?
I was a contractor, too, and still have my contractor's license. Not
only was I a contractor, I was also a local enforcement
official. So I feel their pain, and I try to keep all of that in
perspective as we develop and move forward with these codes. I've
kind of been on several sides of this fence, which helps as we move
through the process.
I just believe in our economy. I believe it's going to turn around,
and I believe this is going to be part of the turnaround. A lot of
people are saying this will create jobs, that our code is very much a
part of the whole green movement. We are hearing that from the
commercial industry, the building industry - they believe that this
will create jobs and that it's going to be a good thing ultimately.
Every change comes, we adjust and we move on.
Thank
you.
For details on the
CALGreen go to http://images.emaildirect.com/clients/
govpressoffice847/GreenBuildingCodeOnepager.pdf.
For the CALGreen
website, go to: http://www.CCBSC.ca.gov/
CALGreen/default.htm
For the CCBSC's
response to criticism from environmental groups go to:
http://images.emaildirect.com/clients/govpressoffice847/
GreenBuildingCodeOnepagerMythvsFact.pdf.