Water
Through the
aqueous humour
Dec 30th
2009
From The
Economist print
edition
Water. By Steven Solomon. Harper; 563 pages;
$27.99. Harper Collins; Ł18.99.
http://www.economist.com/books/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15172532
TO WRITE a history
of water was a good idea. Since life depends on water, it has been
man's constant companion from the moment his forebears emerged from
the sea and, you could say, even before. Human affairs have therefore
been intricately related to water. But man has mistreated his friend,
and now, it is said, the world faces a water crisis. There is too much
of it in some places, too little in others. It has been acidified,
dirtied and squandered. It should no longer be taken for
granted.
The first
three-quarters of Steven Solomon's book is an account of the
ascendancy and decline of various civilisations, seen through a watery
lens. The survey starts in antiquity with Egypt, Mesopotamia and the
areas round the Indus and the Yellow River. It runs through the Roman
empire, the building of China's Grand Canal in the seventh century
and the Islamic era that followed. Then come the stirrings of
mechanical development in medieval Europe that preceded the invention
of the steam engine in Britain, the arrival of the industrial age and
the mass production, and consumption, of the American century. Along
the way the reader learns about aqueducts, dams, canals, waterwheels
and devices for lifting water, as well as sanitary inventions, naval
battles and maritime voyages of discovery. The thesis is that enduring
civilisations are underpinned by effective water control.
As a contention,
this may seem banal, yet the tour d'horizon might also have been
a tour de
force. One
difficulty, though, is that Mr Solomon so often strains to make water
more important than it actually was. The Roman empire, it seems, fell
apart because it lacked the "unifying impetus" of an inland
waterway like China's. It was hydroelectric power, ie, water, that
powered the aircraft factories and aluminium smelters that in turn
played a "decisive role" in America's victory in the second
world war. Sewers and piped water gave the West "comparative
economic and politically legitimising advantages over its cold-war
rivals". The distance-shrinking Panama Canal was another triumph for
water. And it was water, or rather its absence, that obliged
eighth-century Islam to go out and trade and conquer. Indeed, the
Muslims' use of camels-a proxy for the precious liquid-in
crossing deserts just showed the importance of water. No surprise then
to learn that the defining geographical condition of America's Far
West was not its Far Westernness but, yes, water scarcity.
Matching the
over-claiming is the overwriting. Clashes are existential, audacity is
breathtaking. Almost every change is a revolution, every expansion an
explosion. Catalysts abound. Indeed, water, it is said at the outset,
has an "extraordinary capacityŠto catalyse essential chemical
reactions", making it the Earth's "most potent agent of
change". In truth, water is hardly ever a catalyst in ordinary
conditions.
In other respects,
the problem is under-, not over-performance. The 97.5% of water that
is salty, for example, is hardly considered, except as a means of
transport. This leaves quite a hole in a history of water. And though
much is made of the steam engine, ice scarcely merits a mention.
In the last quarter of the book, Mr Solomon abandons history and turns
to the water shortages of today and the political clashes they may
cause. Competition for Nile water is acute between Egypt and Ethiopia.
Fierce disputes also divide Turkey and its southern neighbours in the
Jordan basin. With India and China, both prodigious consumers of
ever-scarcer fresh water, the rivalries are mostly, though not
entirely, internal. And in many places, notably the United States,
north Africa and the Middle East, aquifers whose water may have lain
undisturbed for 10,000 to 75,000 years are now being recklessly
drained, with no prospect of a refill for an aeon or two. Everywhere
it is the poor who suffer most.
Mr Solomon is not
despairing. He gives some reasons for hope. Too bad he did not devote
more of his book to the present and the future, and to the policies
that could alleviate the situation he describes.