I am plowing my way through the "Integral Ecology" material I could
download at
http://www.integralecology.org/explore (click
on right side of page) and was really happy to see the multiple inclusions of
ecopsychology, ecotherapy, terrapsychology and permaculture as
legitimate branches of the field of ecology (you can download the
book's appendix as well as sample chapters.)
It's really cool and a bit mind-blowing to see ecopsych, ecotherapy and
terrapsych finally acknowledged as part of the field of ecology, for
"interior" stuff has been marginalized for so long in the world of reductionist
science that focuses exclusively on observable exteriors. For that alone
the book deserves a lot of credit.
Permaculture also gets its due, with acknowledgment of the work of
Bill Mollison, David Holmgren and Toby Hemenway ("Gaia's
Garden").
I read the definition of ecopsychology in the appendix and while it's true
that it credits "Voice of the Earth" by Roszak as the beginning of
ecopsychology, it does also mention that the field "has its roots in
early uses of the wilderness for psychological transformation in the 1960s" and
talks about Andy Fisher's book "Radical Ecopsychology" as well as the
Roszak/Gomes/Kanner anthology "Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the
Mind." (I know some of you have a different view of the origins of
ecopsychology, so perhaps a note could be sent to the authors for future
editions, correcting the error?)
This book is a fascinating read. I was trained in systems theory and
think that integral theory could offer the next big paradigm shift.
Whatever one thinks of Ken Wilber's work overall, it's clear that this
integrative approach, when applied to specific fields like ecology and the
environment, allows a much broader and more holistic view than the previous
methods. It also offers inspiration for a much wider and more
comprehensive (hopefully more effective) approach to environmental
activism.
Linda Buzzell