I agree with Paul. K and P are more challenging.

 

From: scpg-bounces@arashi.com [mailto:scpg-bounces@arashi.com] On Behalf Of Sierra Permaculture Design
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:18 PM
To: cory8570@yahoo.com
Cc: lapg@arashi.com; scpg@arashi.com
Subject: Re: [Scpg] Chemical nitrogen vs nitrogen fixing plants

 

Nitrogen is easy. It's the lack of replaceable phosphorous that we really need to be worried about.

Paul

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Cory Brennan <cory8570@yahoo.com> wrote:

I would be interested in hearing people's reaction to this article. His premise is that we cannot replace our "Green Revolution" food growing methods with purely organic methods because those don't produce enough nitrogen.  He omits the concept of polycropping as a potential solution.  I'm especially interested in any case studies or documented examples that would refute his premise.

http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~cstevens/ES201/local/Smil%20-%20Global%20Population%20and%20the%20Nitrogen%20Cycle.pdf



--
Sierra Permaculture Design
SierraPermaculture.com
---
Permaculture: Care of Earth, Care of People, Share the Surplus