http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/forum/
     

URBAN REGENERATION
The Prince of Wales asks: "Should we revive urban areas rather than build on green fields?"


"Should we try harder to revive the fortunes of our towns and cities, and of the empty land and buildings that many of them contain, rather than see so many poorly designed developments on green fields? And if we do need to build on green fields, how can the quality of town planning and building design be improved so as to foster community spirit and more sustainable use of resources?

"Our towns and cities can be both the best, and the very worst of places. At best, they are vigorous, exciting, elegant and deeply interesting places to live, to work and to visit. At worst, they are polluted, soulless and devoid of opportunities.

We are told that changes in lifestyle are causing more people to need a home than ever before. In the coming twenty years, nearly four million new households are likely to be formed not least as a result of longer life expectancy and a tendency for people to remain single for longer. To put this into perspective, this means that we may need to find land for more homes than currently exist in the whole of Greater London.

It seems to me that this poses one of the greatest challenges of our generation. Can we find the means to build these new homes, or at least most of them, in ways which enhance the quality of people's lives and of the wider communities around them? Can we take the opportunity to breathe fresh life and wealth into some of the most run down and needy areas of urban Britain? And can we reclaim the thousands of wonderful historic buildings, many of which lie derelict, for new uses?

These questions have concerned me for many years, and I have sponsored attempts to find answers to at least some of them through the work of various organisations which I have initiated.

At Poundbury, on the outskirts of Dorchester, on land owned by the Duchy of Cornwall, a new community is being built with homes for sale and for rent, alongside new factories, shops and a farmers market. Here, we have attempted to draw from the rich architectural and building traditions of Dorset to build a series of urban quarters which properly belong to the neighbouring town and the surrounding landscape, rather than a soulless housing estate, used by its residents, but loved by nobody. Poundbury is a place where people can meet casually in traditionally laid out streets, squares and courtyards, but where the homes are built to the very highest standards of modern design and construction. Poundbury attracts many visitors, from all parts of the United Kingdom and abroad and, for most, seeing becomes believing. I sense it is beginning to help change attitudes towards housing design, mixed communities and estate layouts.

We are told that there is a pressing need for new homes in this country, and where it is simply not possible to find previously used brownfield land, then surely the approach at Poundbury has more to commend it than does the rather depressing spectacle of standardised new housing designs which tell one nothing about the local setting and which lack either the stimulation of a varied neighbourhood or the harmony of careful design and architecture?

Yet within many of our towns and cities there is a considerable amount of spare or under-used land, much of it left over from abandoned industrial uses. Here, I believe, there are great opportunities for rejuvenating our urban environment.

But, again, there must be a better approach to site layout, mixed tenures and architectural manners than is so often the case. An organisation which I helped to establish nearly ten years ago brings together many in the building, architecture, planning and housing sectors in order to promote the construction of just such projects. This organisation, known as The Urban Villages Forum, works closely with project partners around the country, and its small projects team has become a widely respected adviser on urban regeneration plans in many cities. It is currently working on more than twenty such schemes, making the case for community led planning and design which, as I have frequently witnessed, can so often lead to remarkably interesting and successful outcomes.

I have recently established my Prince's Foundation, a new charitable umbrella organisation which will bring The Urban Villages Forum together with my other initiatives in the field of architecture and the built environment. My Foundation will be based in Shoreditch, East London, and it will work from a converted former warehouse, refurbished specifically for the purpose of educating, training and disseminating the advantages of a more people-focused approach to matters of planning, design and construction.

The Prince's Foundation will include the efforts being made by two organisations which were created to help the conversion of derelict buildings of historic value; The Phoenix Trust and Regeneration Through Heritage. There are literally thousands of remarkable heritage buildings, ranging from empty mills to former lunatic asylums.

Many are outstanding examples of the architectural self confidence of the times in which they were built and, in many cases, they continue to articulate a sense of history, status and character to the communities in which they stand. I am convinced that far more can be done to find new uses for these buildings, and I am pleased that in just three short years both The Phoenix Trust and Regeneration Through Heritage have been able to assist in saving around a dozen endangered buildings, with the promise of many more to follow.

This is not an exercise in sterile conservation, but a practical case of commercially viable conversions. At Stanley Mill in Perthshire, Scotland, The Phoenix Trust is converting a huge 18th Century Arkwright mill into new homes at affordable prices, along with a visitor centre.

Regeneration Through Heritage is helping with similar projects in Wakefield, Stockport, Sowerby Bridge and other places, bringing new housing, art galleries, workspaces and community amenities into fine heritage buildings.

There is no doubt that our lives are deeply affected by the physical environment around us, and that ugly buildings and bland public spaces depress the spirits. Yet, of course, the opposite is also true; that our enjoyment of life is hugely enhanced by marvellous places.

It is for this reason that I continue to sponsor training and educational opportunities for those concerned with architecture and the wider design and management of our urban environments. I am convinced that more holistic and practical training, which celebrates the timeless arts of observation, drawing and making, might help to improve the quality of what is built today. Again, these activities will be a very important part of the new Prince's Foundation, in what will, I hope, be a thoroughly lively and inter-disciplinary centre for discussion and for learning.

I am interested to know how others feel about these issues. We live on a crowded island, with a deep and rich history of towns, cities and buildings. We are rightly concerned at the loss of greenery and open countryside. Isn't it time that we recovered some sense of respect for both town and country, by building places which people can feel properly proud to belong to?"

The Prince of Wales,
St James's Palace,
September 1999

Have your say

See also The Prince's speeches and articles on architecture and The Prince's Work in architecture.

© Copyright St James's Palace and the Press Association Ltd 1999. All rights reserved.
  Latest Forum
 
Have Your Say
 
Your Views